Declarations

§ July 4th, 2010 § Filed under Uncategorized, news § No Comments

This is less an art related post and more a thoughts on politics and observations post. It’s the 4th of July, and in America, that’s Independence Day.

A little history about the holiday:

During the American Revolution, the legal separation of the American colonies from Great Britain occurred on July 2, 1776, when the Second Continental Congress voted to approve a resolution of independence that had been proposed in June by Richard Henry Lee of Virginia.

After voting for independence, Congress turned its attention to the Declaration of Independence, a statement explaining this decision, which had been prepared by a Committee of Five, with Thomas Jefferson as its principal author. Congress debated and revised the Declaration, finally approving it on July 4. A day earlier, John Adams had written to his wife Abigail:

The second day of July, 1776, will be the most memorable epoch in the history of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated by succeeding generations as the great anniversary festival. It ought to be commemorated as the day of deliverance, by solemn acts of devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires, and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward forever more.

Adams’ prediction was off by two days. From the outset, Americans celebrated independence on July 4, the date shown on the much-publicized Declaration of Independence, rather than on July 2, the date the resolution of independence was approved in a closed session of Congress. Historians have long disputed whether Congress actually signed the Declaration of Independence on July 4, even though Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Benjamin Franklin all later wrote that they had signed it on that day. Most historians have concluded that the Declaration was signed nearly a month after its adoption, on August 2, 1776, and not on July 4 as is commonly believed.

In a remarkable coincidence, both John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, the only signers of the Declaration of Independence to later serve as President of the United States, died on the same day: July 4, 1826, which was the 50th anniversary of the Declaration.

Yeah – I got all that from Wikipedia. Anyway…What does freedom mean to you? What is a Declaration of Independence? How do you define and declare your independence? What do you need to define yourself as being independent from? Is there something in your life you can use to take this day and make it personal?

234 years ago, the baby nation of America struggled to assert its independence from Britian. In the intervening years, we’ve fought battles with Mexico, Spain, Germany, Russia, Italy, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, to name a few. We’ve participated in “peacekeeping” efforts in other countries, almost always losing someone’s son or daughter in the mission.

Yet here, on our own soil, there are people who are not free. People who are trapped by mental and physical illness that cannot be cared for, because of a lack of government funding for health care. Women, children and pets are terrorized by abusive husbands and fathers. Entire neighborhoods are trapped in their homes to avoid being caught in the crossfire of gang warfare. The “war on drugs” is a losing battle, because the addicts are still trapped in a cycle of desperation, and the children are often the victims of this struggle – by losing their homes, being affected by chemical exposure, burns, and neglect.

What is freedom to you? Where should our government money go in this day and age? To protect others? To build new nation-states? To display our military might all over the world?

Or should we come back home, to America, and make this truly the land of the free and the home of the brave? Help the ones who are helpless here on our own soil? Feed the hungry, care for the sick, shelter the homeless – this is freedom. A country that does not care for its own is no free country at all.

Tosca

§ April 25th, 2010 § Filed under Saturday Art Blogging § No Comments

So, I’ve missed a couple Saturday Morning Art Blogging posts, and today isn’t Saturday morning, but I wanted to get this one up as part of the series.

Last night, we went to the opera to see Tosca. Live opera was everything I had imagined it could be, and more. This review isn’t so much the performance review as it is just thoughts from the first experience seeing opera.

Our seats were about 10 rows back from the stage in the orchestra circle, on the right side. I could see everything. The expression on the performers faces, the smaller gestures that don’t carry back to the balcony, everything. The opera house has an amazing setup, with a very very steep structure so there is supposed to be “no bad seats” – which I’d agree with, from where I sat (ha!) Next time, I’d be perfectly happy with mezz or balcony seating.

The stage set was gorgeous, the performance was amazing, and by the second act, when Tosca’s heart is breaking at the agony she is being put through – betray her love for Mario in order to save his life – both Marcus and I had tears just pouring down our faces. The third act was even more powerful, more beautiful, and more heart-wrenching, and we sobbed through nearly the whole thing.

The Ellie Caulkins opera house has one small feature that I think people would appreciate in some ways, but totally annoyed me: subtitles.

Every seat has a small led screen that flashes the English or Spanish translation of the performance, at the time the performers are singing the words on stage in italian, german, french, whatever. While I can appreciate the subtle nuances that are made available (like the line about the Voltaire reading rebels who don’t believe in Rome or God) – I really wanted to go into the performance with just the synopsis, and ‘see’ and ‘hear’ the performance in the italian to get the full experience. I was able to turn my words off, and the panels are set in such a way that you can’t see the ones to the sides – but the whole ten rows in front of me flashed like a field of blue every time the singing started, and it was really really distracting. In the first act, I found myself watching the subtitles and that pulled me out of the performance. But in the second and third acts, I worked really really hard to not read what they said, and focused on the stage. I felt more connected to the performers at that point, and I feel the subtitling really creates a wall between the performers and the audience. If you have a really good cast (which I think this performance did) they should be able to, for the most part, convey those nuances through their performance so you know what’s going on.

Sure, it’s easy for me to say all this because I have listened to opera, and I read the synopsis, and while I don’t speak italian, I speak enough french to pick up certain words, and I’m experienced with being an observant audience member for symphonic performances, plays, art, etc. I realize the subtitles are a way of bringing the accessibility to a wider audience, to cultivate a new crop of supporters, but still. I just wish the screens had been placed a bit lower, made a bit smaller, or a little dimmer.

Anyway. The performance? 5 stars. The opera house? 3.5 stars.

Mojn

§ April 10th, 2010 § Filed under Saturday Art Blogging, movies § 1 Comment

Typically I will look at artwork for Saturday Morning Art Blogging, but today, I’m going to tell you about a movie. First of all, movies can be art, and that’s my link for the purpose of including it in my blogging. Last night, the boyfriend and I went to the Mayan Theater here in Denver to see Terribly Happy, also known as Frygtelig lykkelig, the Danish submission for the 2009 Oscars.

This isn’t my typical type of movie. I didn’t watch the trailer beforehand, and there is a chance that, had I done that, I might not have wanted to go see the film. But, I heard about it briefly on the radio, with the summary “a dark film about the lengths people will go to fit in.”

And that is what it was, but it was also so much much more. Terribly Happy is visually enticing, and beautifully filmed. The shots contrast between bleak open Danish landscapes, full of water, mud and flat grey skies, to tight busy shots of interactions between people, to repeated shots of the visual expressions of the cast of characters. The landscape and the town are desolate, but the minds of the people are active, and in everyone’s business. Nothing goes unnoticed in this small town in South Jutland, Denmark. Far away from Copenhagen, the smallest difference is marked as a glaring fault of those who don’t belong.

After I was asleep last night, still thinking about the movie, I sat bolt-upright in bed and smacked my boyfriend – “The bog! The bog! It’s a symbol! It’s a metaphor!!” In the movie, the bog is the location of vigilante justice, the site of the secrets that are buried in the psyche of the town. At the bog, people and animals get sucked in, and disappear. Likewise, in this small town, the quiet madness of the characters sucks people in, and they either fall into a struggle with trying to maintain their personal truth, or completely losing their minds into the play of endless bleak days.

At times, as a viewer, I was thoroughly irritated with some of the characters for their fatal flaws and obvious bad decision making, and yet – the tension and anxiety throughout the film makes you wonder just what exactly is going on…and at the end, a surprising puppetmaster arises. Who is really pulling the strings?

I highly recommend this film if it is playing near you. It’s a worthwhile hour and 40 minutes. And yes, it’s in Danish, with subtitles.

« Older Entries